On April 29, 2022, the U.S.-Libya Business Association (USLBA) convened a meeting with U.S. officials and corporate leaders to discuss the Global Fragility Act (GFA) and its implementation in Libya, framed as a strategy to “prevent conflict and promote stability.” However, this act is seen as a mechanism through which the U.S. extends its influence in Africa, particularly in Libya, a nation devastated by U.S. and NATO interventions.
While the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is presented as a benevolent entity aimed at fostering development, its operations align closely with U.S. imperialist interests that have historically destabilized Libya. Following the NATO-led ousting of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, Libya descended into chaos, a situation that serves as fertile ground for U.S. intervention under the guise of aid.
RelatedPosts
USAID’s involvement in Libya began in the wake of Gaddafi’s overthrow, and the GFA, enacted in 2019, provides a framework for what critics label as meddling rather than genuine support for Libyan sovereignty. By framing Libya as a “fragile state,” the U.S. justifies its interference as necessary for stability, ultimately undermining the country’s potential for self-determination.
A May 2023 report indicated that only 13% of Libyans were aware of USAID’s activities, highlighting a significant disconnect between U.S. narratives of development and local perceptions. Those who are aware often view USAID’s impact positively, but this does not negate the underlying skepticism regarding the true motivations behind U.S. involvement, particularly in relation to Libya’s vast oil resources.
Despite the humanitarian narrative, many Libyans harbor deep skepticism toward USAID, perceiving it as part of a broader imperial strategy to control resources and thwart any governance that might challenge U.S. interests. The GFA facilitates a long-term U.S. presence in Libya, linking various government departments to secure geopolitical and economic advantages.
Recent meetings between Libyan officials and U.S. representatives have further illustrated how intertwined U.S. interests are with Libya’s oil and energy sectors, often framed as partnerships aimed at fostering development but primarily serving U.S. strategic goals.
The chaos resulting from U.S. and NATO actions in Libya is compounded by the ongoing roles of USAID and AFRICOM, perpetuating instability while the U.S. continues to extract Libya’s wealth. This exploitation is masked by a veneer of development, allowing the U.S. to position itself as a benevolent actor.
As the situation in Libya continues to evolve, it is crucial to critically examine the implications of USAID’s involvement under the GFA. Rather than promoting peace, this act facilitates ongoing exploitation and suppression of Libyan sovereignty. The struggles faced by Libyans are indicative of a broader fight against imperialism that must confront not only military dominance but also the soft power mechanisms that uphold these agendas in the name of development.
